Nobody likes getting tickets for speeding. They are annoying. They are time consuming. They damage your wallet when you have to pay the penalty and if you have to pay an increase in insurance premiums. And you’ve heard that they can be defeated. And a Google search for how to beat a speeding ticket returns millions of results. So how do you do it? The bottom line, most people hire a traffic ticket attorney to help them.

But what do speeding ticket attorneys do that a normal older person cannot? Aren’t speeding tickets the bottom of the barrel when it comes to an attorney? And is any lawyer who works on speeding tickets not a bad lawyer at all? It seems that if they had any skills, they would be doing something a little more important.

The short answer is that traffic lawyers are usually very good lawyers and they take their craft seriously. As in any industry, there are some good and some bad, some who work hard and enjoy winning cases, and others who are more concerned with collecting fees. But in the end, having an attorney on your side to fight your speeding ticket can make a huge difference in the outcome of your case, which usually ends up being a termination or a finding that the violation was not committed. So how do they do it? Short answer: they advocate like the guys who are running multi-million dollar litigation and murder trials.

Most of the speeding ticket attorneys I know work a case from top to bottom examining the following three issues: (1) procedural violations; (2) radar maintenance and requirements violations; and (3) substantive violations. Each presents their own opportunities for dismissal or finding unencumbered. And the reason they are done in this order is that violations in the first category are easier to find and completely destroy the legitimacy of the ticket. When you enter category three, one begins to enter a grayer area that may or may not result in an uncompromised finding.

Procedural violations, as they sound like, deal with the police, the prosecutor, and the courts by following the rules they must follow in traffic violation cases. Although these are easy for a speeding ticket attorney to verify, for most people (i.e., the inexperienced eye) these would never be detected. And you could try listing all of these, but it would take too long and it would probably be quite difficult to understand. However, if you find a procedural violation, the result is a total dismissal of the fine.

Radar maintenance records and maintenance requirements are the second avenue by which a traffic ticket attorney generally proceeds to have a speeding ticket dismissed. Because radar is often the method of detecting most sprinters, the evidence from the radar used must be presented as evidence for the radar reading to be admitted as evidence. And because radar is a scientific machine that uses scientific information, specific things have to be presented to the court so that you can be sure that the machine was doing what it was supposed to do and was doing what it was supposed to do. do that particular day. Like procedural violations, a violation here results in the dismissal of the case (although here it is because the evidence is excluded from the hearing).

And finally, if avenues one or two do not work, the third way is to determine if there is enough evidence present to allow the court to determine a crime committed. What this generally means is checking the officers’ report for errors or omissions that make the fine unenforceable. Again, this goes back to the legal profession, making sure they can make the case against their client stand. And you can often find something here to at least make a convincing argument.

In the end, speeding tickets are something that can be overcome. And while it is possible to do it on your own, the skill and experience a lawyer brings to the table greatly increases the likelihood of victory on your part. So the next time you receive a traffic ticket, consider hiring a lawyer who specializes in speeding tickets. It could mean the difference between winning and losing.